This is What New Yorkers Do

RELATED: 104 JOHNS NABBED IN NASSAU COUNTY TRYING TO PAY FOR SEX
The operation has netted more than 900 arrests since 2011, and cops have seized about 220 vehicles used by johns.
Kelly said the NYPD has also established a Human Trafficking Squad within the Vice Division of the department’s Organized Crime Control Bureau.
RELATED: EAST HARLEM MAN FORCED TWO WOMEN AND 17-YEAR-OLD GIRL INTO SEX TRADE: POLICE
The officers assisted in last month’s arrest of Taye Ellerby, 35, who allegedly forced two women and a teenage runaway from Connecticut to prostitute themselves in his East Harlem apartment.
“The brutal sex trafficking industry, which preys on and victimizes New York City’s most vulnerable women, men and children, is fueled by prostitution patronizers, who believe that they can buy the bodies of people in prostitution with impunity,” said Dorchen Leidholdt, director of the Sanctuary for Families’ Center for Battered Women’s Legal Services. “Attacking the demand for prostitution is the best way to prevent and curtail trafficking in our city.”


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-sting-busts-156-johns-massive-bust-week-article-1.1365548#ixzz2j373IeMV

New York State Cult King

CULT CRIMES AND SATANIC RITUALS"A cult is a religion with no political power" (Tom Wolfe)

    Tragically, all religions justify violence, but so-called "cults" tend to be very harmful to society as well as their own members.  Cult violence is a form of collective behavior characterized by progressive escalation of conflict, internal radicalization, and the impossibility of escape or retreat from the inevitability of extreme violence (Bromley & Melton 2002).  In short, cults are inherently dangerous.  In fact, few things are more dangerous and destructive.  Witness the well-known media cases of them, such as the Jonestown massacre, the Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate, Solar Temple, or Aum Shinrikyo, and one will quickly surmise that they are indeed dangerous, at least as dangerous, if not more so, than terrorism.

    Little is known about the causes and dynamics of cult violence.  Many people assume that "authorities" have them under surveillance (not true).  Infiltration is about the only law enforcement technique that works, and cults are highly sensitive to this.  Many people think they aren't a problem as long as they kill their own members (the so-called "somebody else's religion" syndrome).  Many people are tolerant of cults because they see them as start-up religions that simply haven't acquired enough real estate yet.  Some people are tolerant of cults because they don't see the dangerousness aspect to them.  Others avoid talking about them out of political correctness or because they fear getting sued for insulting them.  It is time to start paying serious academic attention to cults.

    There are similarities and differences between sects and cults.  Both sects and cults tend to be quite dogmatic with coherent ideologies, and both tend to believe they hold the "one true way" to truth and salvation (Wallis 1976).  However, a sect simply encourages thought reform among its members.  A cult systematically engages in mind control, in a way that jeopardizes the health and safety of its members.  For example, a sect encourages its members to go without food (fast) for several days.  A cult deliberately malnourishes its members (for their own good).  Technically, a sect is an offshoot of an established religion.  Its leaders tend to come from the lower classes, and they sympathize with the lower classes.  In fact, one of the common characteristics of a sect is a disdain for the habits of the wealthy.  Cult leaders tend to come from the upper classes, and they hate the lower classes.  Sects either die off or expand into established denominations, depending upon how well they embrace or try to play politics.  Cults tend to reject politics except for when the ultimate showdown comes with outer-worldliness.  Sects get violent progressively while in political manipulation mode (we call this sectarian violence).  Cults get violent suddenly and without warning in a kind of rabid, feverish outbreak that someone will undoubtedly say we should have seen coming (we call this lunatic fringe violence).  

    Cults, to be fair, tend to mostly produce low-level, small-group violence.  They can also produce lone wolf violence.  Their pattern is difficult, but not impossible, to predict.  They may be most violent when they claim to have invented something completely new and fantastic OR when they claim to have discovered something lost and forgotten.  They may come to a sudden demise when their leader dies OR they may remerge stronger and more dangerous under a new leader.  Leadership succession is critical, but most cults don't prepare for it.  The inability to groom successors is the proverbial downfall of all megalomaniacs and narcissists.  Some cult leaders have more serious psychological problems; they can also be a sadist.  In other cases, they will manipulate their followers and audiences by playing the role of weak, helpless victim.  When the cult has a doomsday orientation, it may be unclear whether they have more suicidal than homicidal tendencies, or vice versa.  It may very well be when the group is at its most uncertain when they are most dangerous and destructive.  However, standard warning signs exist.

Newburg, New YORK State Drug Scene

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that Wilson Pagan, a/k/a “King Gunz,” and Christian Sanchez, a/k/a “King Chi Chi,” leaders of the Latin Kings gang in Newburgh, New York (the “Newburgh Latin Kings”), were found guilty today before U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel in White Plains federal court of 29 counts, including murder, racketeering, drug, firearms, and witness tampering charges, after a six-week jury trial. Judge Seibel set July 11, 2013, for sentencing, at which time Pagan and Sanchez will both face mandatory terms of life in prison.
Pagan and Sanchez are two of 35 members and associates of the Newburgh Latin Kings originally indicted in connection with the case, all of whom have been convicted. Among other charges, Pagan was found guilty of the May 6, 2008 murder of Jeffrey Zachary, and Sanchez was found guilty of the March 11, 2010 murder of Jerome Scarlett, a/k/a “Rudeboy,” and the murder of John Maldonado, a/k/a “Tarzan,” less than 24 hours later, on March 12, 2010.
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated, “For far too long, the residents of Newburgh were plagued by lethal violence and narcotics trafficking at the hands of these two defendants and their cronies and, in just nine hours, the jury unanimously found them guilty of a catalogue of crimes, including the tragic murder of an innocent 15-year-old boy who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Their reign of terror is now over for good, and everyone can breathe easier as a result. Today’s guilty verdicts are the latest example of how we are making good on our promise to eradicate the scourge of gangs and to give neighborhoods back to their residents, and together with our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners, we will continue our fight.”
According to the evidence at trial before Judge Seibel:
Between 2007 and 2011, the Newburgh Latin Kings and their trusted associates sold crack cocaine, heroin, powder cocaine, and marijuana at drug spots in Newburgh, including the areas of Benkard Avenue and William Street, and South Miller Street and Broadway. Gang members and associates protected the gang’s drug turf, drugs, and drug money, with guns and violence. The violence included frequent shootings, stabbings, and assaults of rival drug dealers, including members of another gang in Newburgh known as the Bloods, as well as witnesses and suspected government witnesses within their own gang.
The Newburgh Latin Kings were governed by a council of five officers, who were referred to as crowns (collectively, the “Crown Council”). Pagan and Sanchez each served as the First Crown and overall head of the Newburgh Latin Kings—Pagan from 2008 through January 2010 and Sanchez from February 2010 through February 2011.
The Newburgh Latin Kings had regular chapter meetings at which attendance was mandatory and members were required to pay dues. At the meetings, members discussed their criminal activities and alleged transgressions of chapter rules. They also directed punishments, known as “violations,” against members who were determined to have committed transgressions. Furthermore, at the meetings the Newburgh Latin Kings discussed conflicts with other gangs. In some instances, the Crown Council used meetings to order attacks on individuals and rival gangs.
On May 6, 2008, two members of the Newburgh Latin Kings were ordered by Pagan and another leader of the gang to shoot a member of the Bloods on Dubois Street in Newburgh. The members of the gang then drove to the vicinity of Dubois Street and shot at individuals they mistakenly believed were members of the Bloods, including Jeffrey Zachary, a 15-year old, who was shot and killed.
The Latin Kings violence continued after the Zachary murder and included a violent altercation on November 1, 2008, when Pagan ordered other members of the Latin Kings to bring a gun to South Miller Street in Newburgh, resulting in another member of the gang discharging a gun; the stabbing of a gang member, on orders from Pagan, in January 2010; and the attempted stabbing of a gang member, who was believed cooperating with law enforcement, on orders from Sanchez in February 2010.
The violence culminated in March 2010 with the shooting deaths of Scarlett and Maldonado on back-to-back nights of bloodshed. Sanchez along with other leaders of the Newburgh Latin Kings ordered the murder of Maldonado. Sanchez spoke on the phone with other members of the gang at they walked Maldonado to the intersection of Benkard and Little Monument Street, where a shooter, recruited by gang members that same day, lay in wait to gun Maldonado down. After the shooting, the same leaders of the gang spoke to Sanchez on the phone as they stood over Maldonado, who lay dying in the street.
Finally, in September 2010, Sanchez shot another member of the gang during a violent confrontation over the leadership of the gang.

* * *

The investigation resulting in the prosecution of members and associates of the Newburgh Latin Kings was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Hudson Valley Safe Streets Task Force, which combined the efforts of dozens of law enforcement officers from federal, state, and local agencies and departments, including agents and officers with the FBI; the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; the City of Newburgh Police Department; Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations; the Middletown Police Department; the Orange County Sheriff’s Office; the New York State Police; and the Town of Newburgh Police Department. Mr. Bharara thanked the member agencies of the task force for their work in the investigation.
The prosecution is being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Nicholas McQuaid, Benjamin Allee, and Abigail Kurland are in charge of the prosecution.

New Yorkers Are Control Freaks

Be able to recognize the signs of a control freak. Often, controlling behavior will parallel abusive behavior. A control freak can be a casual acquaintance, such as a co-worker (we've all experienced one of those!) or it can be someone close to you. Control freaks can often lie at the root of a dysfunctional family. If you begin to feel like you can't speak or breathe without permission, you have a control freak on your hands, and you need to do something about it, and fast.

2

When they critisize you, do not respond. Do not provide them with any type of reaction, including emotional displays, arguments or disagreement. This fighting is what a control freak lives for, and the battle is their dessert. Don't give it to them. Refuse to fight, refuse the battle. You're not losing, you're simply not participating.

Sponsored Links

• Criminal Arrest Records
  1) Enter Name - Search Free! 2) Get a Criminal Background Check.
  CriminalRecords.PeopleSmart.com

3

Tell them as little as possible, the less information they know about you, the better, because they will be unable to control what you say and do. Vary your behaviors, keep them guessing, and before long, they won't have a hold of you any longer. Be careful, being around these types of people can take a toll on your own mental health, and you will have to make a conscious effort to ensure that you remain mentally healthy and strong. Depression and anxiety can present itself over time and may require professional treatment.

4

Obtaining some type of counseling or therapeutic intervention for yourself is always a good idea, so that you are able to assess any damage that might have been caused during your relationship with the control freak. An even better case scenario would be for you to assist the control freak in obtaining some therapy or treatment for themselves, so that they can begin to live a normal healthy existence without controlling other people.

Read more: http://www.ehow.com/how_4722541_away-control-freaks-power.html#ixzz2i7Sqkkgj

Unions

The Teamsters, AFL-CIO, and the rest of the unions are just a bunch of thugs.  They are ruled by the mafia.  They bully to get what they want.  Like the old days they will do the same thing today.  They will beat people up to get what they want.  They just take money out of pockets of people and do nothing for it, except violence. 
I'm so glad the South hates unions & wants nothing to do with them.  They are liars, dishonest and slobs.  They are truly brain dead.

Drug Addicts & CRIME

DRUG ADDICTION IN RELATION TO CRIME

One of the compelling reasons why more rational methods of dealing with drug addicts must be devised is the close relationship between drug addiction and crime. The compulsion for the drug makes every drug addict a law violator and a criminal. Mere possession of a narcotic drug which the addict must have to ward off withdrawal distress is a violation of the narcotic laws. Thus, every drug addict is subject to arrest by the police, and as we have seen, the arrests of addicts and of narcotic law violators have gone up by leaps and bounds. Addicts guilty of no other crime than illegal possession of narcotics are filling the jails, prisons and penitentiaries of the country.

However, this is only a part of the distressing picture of the relationship between narcotic addiction and criminality. For most narcotic addicts, predatory crime (larceny, shoplifting, sneak thievery, burglary, embezzlement, robbery, etc.), is a necessary way of life. This was clearly recognized by the law enforcement officials who appeared before the Congressional Committees and gave testimony concerning the close relationship between property crime and drug addiction in their communities. These officials were convinced that property crimes could be reduced materially if all drug addicts could be incarcerated.

The New York University and the Chicago studies on drug addiction support the notion that drug addiction necessarily leads to predatory crime as a way of life. For example, Chein and Rosenfeld make the following comments based on their studies of juvenile addicts: "Drug use leads to a criminal way of life. The illegality of purchase and possession of opiates and similar drugs makes a drug user a delinquent ipso facto. The high cost of heroin, the drug generally used by juvenile users, also forces specific delinquency against property for cash returns. The average addicted youngster spends almost forty dollars a week on drugs, often as much as seventy dollars. He is too young and unskilled to be able to support his habit by his earnings. The connection between drug use and delinquency for profit has been established beyond any doubt."56 A Chicago study comes to a similar conclusion: "...Almost without exception addicts resort to theft to obtain money for the purchase of the drugs. The compulsion of the addiction itself coupled with the astronomically high cost of heroin leads the addict inescapably to crime. For the addict there is very simply no alternative."57 There has been considerable debate as to whether the criminality of the addict preceded or is merely a consequence of the drug addiction. Studies like those of Pescor can be cited for the proposition that most narcotic addicts became delinquents and criminals after the onset of their addiction. Pescor found in 1943. that of the 1,036 patients at Lexington, studied by him, 75.3% had no history of delinquency prior to addiction.58 Anslinger, however, has the always taken the view that the drug addict was usually a criminal first before becoming addicted.59 The answer to the question of whether the addict was a delinquent or criminal prior to addiction largely depends upon the particular groups of addicts studied. For example, Kolb60, in 1928, studied a group of 119 so called "medical addicts", persons who became addicted to drugs as a result of the prescription of narcotics for ailments other than addiction. Kolb found that of these 119 addicts, 90 had never previously been arrested. However, the studies conducted in New York and Chicago present a different picture. These studies of drug addiction were conducted in areas with high rates of delinquency and crime. They were also concerned with youthful and adolescent offenders. The conclusion from the Chicago and New York studies is inescapable that "delinquency both preceded and followed addiction to heroin."61 "Persons who became users," stated the Chicago report, "were found to have engaged in delinquency in a group habitual form either prior to their use of drugs or simultaneously with their developing interest in drugs. There was little evidence of a consistent sequence from drug use without delinquency to drug use with delinquency."62 Nevertheless, even in the delinquency areas of our large cities, there are persons who become addicted to drugs without a prior career of delinquency and crime. After addiction, however, they will usually turn to delinquency and crime "often after overcoming severe psychological conflict occasioned by their repugnance to theft."63 Moreover, the addict who had previously been a delinquent loses all chance of shaking off habits of delinquency and crime as he grows older. Not all non addicted delinquents and adolescent offenders living in the delinquency areas of our large cities grow up to be habitual and professional criminals. Many abandon their delinquent and criminal pursuits when they reach early adulthood. They find jobs, marry and settle down to productive lives. But if the delinquent or adolescent offender adds narcotic addiction to his patterns of behavior, ". ..All possible future retreat from a delinquent mode of life is cut off regardless of whatever later impulses they may have to reject a criminal career in favor of a conventional one. They are constrained by their unremitting need and the high cost of heroin to continue in crime. This interpretation supports the conclusion that drug addiction results in a large and permanent increase in the volume of crime."64 Thus, the realities of the relationship between narcotic addiction and crime appear to be much more somber than the romantic myth, "that hold-up men, murderers, rapists and other violent criminals take drugs to give them courage or stamina to go through with acts which they might not commit when not drugged."65 Dr. Kolb has labeled this notion an "absurd fallacy." The crimes committed by opiate addicts are generally of a parasitic, predatory nonviolent character. Drug addicts may, on occasion, commit violent crimes. This is hardly surprising since so many are classified as psychopaths. A psychopath tends towards serious criminality with or without drug addiction. Generally, however, the use of opiate drugs (whatever may be the case with marihuana and cocaine) tends to discourage violent crime. As Maurer and Vogel point out: "The sense of well-being and satisfaction with the world are so strong that, coupled with the depressant action of the drug, the individual is unlikely to commit aggressive or violent crime after he is addicted, even though he habitually or professionally did so previous to addiction. In the words of Kolb, 'Both heroin and morphine in large doses change drunken fighting psychopaths into sober, cowardly, non-aggressive idlers ...' "...To date, there has been no evidence collected to show that any significant percentage of opiate addicts commit violent crimes either professionally or casually while under the influence of these drugs ... the reduction or elimination of sexual desire tends to remove the opiate addict from the category of psychopathic sex offenders, even though he might have a tendency to commit sex crimes when not addicted ..."66 Since opiate drugs do not act as a stimulant for the commission of violent crime, should not confirmed addicts have a means of obtaining such drugs legally, so that they will not have to engage in crime in order to raise the money necessary for their needs? This basic question goes to the heart of our present policy in dealing with drugs addiction.

Speaking of Getting Shot

It was a hot summer day a few years ago.  A little old lady went food shopping.  She put her groceries in the back seat of her  car.  She got in her car and was getting ready to drive home.  Pop in the back of her head.  She slumped over on the steering wheel.  She stayed like that for about a half hour.  A police car came by and saw her laying on the steering wheel.  He opened the car door and said to the lady are you okay.  The lady replied I have been shot in the head.  The cop noticed their was a biscuit on the back of her head.  Her biscuits exploded in the hot car and popped her in the head. 
I thought this was one of the funniest true stories I have ever heard.
What would we ever do without little senior citizens like her.  Dear Lord!

New York State Kondelka Crime Family

My mom was a great woman.  She got drug houses closed down and turned over to the Sheriff to be auctioned off.  She was a really good mom.
Anthony and Elizabeth Kondelka killed her.  She was 92 years old and they kicked her out of her apartment.  My mom paid them $40,000.00 to build the apartment for her.  She also paid Elizabeth $10,000.00 a year rent for it too.  They didn't like her personality.  They all wanted her to act like them, so they kick her out of her apartment.  One day Elizabeth went to pick up Anthony in the Lincoln my mom bought for her.  Anthony got in the front seat and said, what did you do throw rags in the back seat, the car smells.  My mom was in the back seat.  That's the way they always talked about her.  Elizabeth would even charge my mom to take her into town from where they lived on Karen Drive in Bloomingburg, New York.  Elizabeth even took my moms life insurance policy for $4,000.00 and cashed it in and kept it.  It was suppose to go to pay on my moms funeral.  My brother and I had to pay for her funeral.
I couldn't get to my mom in time to help her.  So she had to go to the city and ended up braking her hip and dying.  All because of Elizabeth and Anthony.  My mom was still driving & had 20/20 vision at 92.  She was as sharp as a tack too.
My mom said they were all F*** Faces and they defiantly are.
Anthony is strange too.  He still kisses his 52 year old son on the lips.  He plays the part up as being a good citizen  too by playing Santa for all the little kids.
They are catholic and Anthony is a veteran and they are a lot of bs.
Elizabeth does the family taxes and books for over 40 years.  They have a wealthy construction company.  They own duplexes too that they rent out.  They didn't need my moms little bit of money.  Elizabeth stole what was left of my moms money that was suppose to be split up between our family too.  They thrived all their lives stealing from people.
Their whole family is violent.  Elizabeth and Anthony's grandson who was 6 years old at the time, locked a 5 year old in the trunk of the car and left him their.  If my mom wasn't near by that little boy would have suffocated in the trunk.  Their grandson is going to be a lot of trouble in the future, I just know it.  At 6 years old he would say to my mom, what the hell are you doing here.  This is the way the whole Kondelka family is.
Their other grandson is going to college to be a lawyer.  He will probably be their family lawyer for all their dirty deeds.

New York State Welfare Slobs

Yes, that's what New Yorker on Welfare are, slobs.  Do you know that in New York State you have to qualify as an INDIGENT to get welfare.  So when ever you see someone in New York State on welfare, remember they are dirty indigents.  They live like slobs, act like slobs, and they are generation and generation of indigents.  They rob people, they use drugs, they are lazy, they are lower than tramps.
Do you know welfare was created in 1935 for widows to help them get along.  Now every slob that comes along gets it, but widows don't.